![]() ![]() Common commercial products I tested do not focus on a huge load of functionality but on a lean, fast and simple workflow from library management until web upload, and thats a good thing. ![]() ![]() But this creates another issue which is, in my oppinion, somewhat more problematic: it massively interrupts workflow. So, by power of open source, one can overcome this issue by using additional programs for lens correction, hdr stitching, post processing, web upload and whatever. But in contrast to its commercial competitors it lacks some features (which is not quite surprising as its a free and voluntary project). As for image quality i'm very pleased from the first results. I've just downloaded LightZone in order to find my best choice to get pretty high quality results without much effort (also among commercial products). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |